Not for sale
- Sarah Lee

- Jul 4
- 3 min read

The form that never moved on
You fill out the application. You upload the resume. You move on to the next opening. What rarely crosses your mind is that the form did not move on with you. It stayed, and to someone it is worth money.
Almost 40 percent of job seekers say they never delete the profiles they create on job-search platforms. That figure comes from an Incogni survey of 1,000 Americans conducted May 5 to 8, 2026. More than a third of them held accounts on over two platforms at once. Each profile is a standing record of a person's history, salary hopes, location, and ambition, left open long after the search ends.
The wrong assumption
Most people assume that record goes only to employers. The same Incogni survey found 37 percent believe job-search platforms share user data solely with potential hiring companies. That assumption is wrong.
Incogni examined nine major job-search and networking platforms. Eight of them sell user data under the definition set out in the California Consumer Privacy Act. The policies that disclose this run, on average, at a college-graduate reading level and take about 35 minutes to read in full. Nearly half of job seekers admitted they skim those policies or skip them entirely. The consent exists on paper. It was never built to be understood.
The file you never saw
In January 2026, job applicants filed a proposed class action against the AI hiring firm Eightfold, a tool used by companies including Microsoft and PayPal. Fortune reported on January 26 that the complaint accuses Eightfold of compiling reports on candidates without their knowledge, drawing on social media profiles, location data, and device tracking to score each applicant's likelihood of success from zero to five. Lower scores were filtered out before a person ever read the application. Eightfold denies the allegations and says it works only with data candidates share or customers provide.
Set the legal question aside. The human fact remains. A file was assembled about a person, used to judge that person, and the person was never shown it.
What we chose not to build
CoBlack was built on the opposite premise. We do not sell user data. We do not train on it. We source openings only from validated employer career pages and ATS feeds, not by scraping the web for whatever a profile leaves behind. Your history belongs to you, and it is used to help you find work, nothing else.
This was not a feature we added later. It is the floor we started from. A job search already asks a person to hand over the most personal account of who they are and what they can do. The least a company can do is not resell it.
The price of a free search
There is an old warning that when a product is free, you are the product. In job search, the price has been quiet and the buyer invisible. People trade their data for a chance at an interview, and the trade keeps paying out long after the interview never comes.
Job search data privacy is not a setting you toggle at the end. It is a decision a company makes before it writes a line of code. CoBlack walks beside the job seeker, never past them into a data market. Your search should end when you find work, not your privacy along with it.




Comments